Understanding the Rural Households’ Renewable Energy Consumption: From Measuring to Incentivizing

Wang Bo, Chen Yalin, Feng Rong Rong, Zhu Wenqi

Abstract


Rural decarbonizing is considered a crucial part of the broader decarbonization. However, there is few research measure the rural households' renewable energy consumption (REC) intention systematically. To fill the gap, taking the China rural region as instance, this paper designs and validates a scale measuring the intention of households' REC by the framework of the extended planning behavior theory (E-TPB). Based on the scale, further surveys were respectively implemented in 2019 and 2023, providing the sampling data for examining the impact of decarbonizing policies from the perspective of quasi-natural experiment. The difference-in-difference (DID) method, combined with propensity score matching (PSM), are applied to verify the policies’ impact on the intention factors, which illustrate the driven-path of REC intention forming. The findings suggest that implementing decarbonizing policies significantly promotes rural households' REC. Additionally, factors such as "subjective norms", "moral norms", income, and education positively influence the adoption of REC in rural households. However, "perceived behavioral control" has an inhibitory effect on REC. By measuring rural households' REC intention, the acceptance and effectiveness of existing decarbonizing policies can be assessed, providing a basis for further adjustment.

Keywords


Decarbonizing policy; Difference-in-difference; Propensity score matching; Renewable energy consumption; Rural household

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yang F. and C. Li. 2024. The Status Quo, Dilemma, and Transformation Path of the Carbon Neutrality-Related Policy of the ASEAN. Sustainability 16(3): 1348.

Liu G., Du S., Gao Y., Xiong X., Lombardi G.V., Meng F., Chen Y., and Chen C., 2024. A study on energy-water-food-carbon nexus in typical Chinese northern rural households. Energy Policy 188: 114100.

Li M., Liu X., and Yang M., 2024. Analyzing the regional inequality of renewable energy consumption and its driving factors: Evidence from China. Renewable Energy 223: 120043.

Anton S.G. and A.E.A. Nucu. 2020. The effect of financial development on renewable energy consumption. A panel data approach. Renewable Energy 147: 330-338.

Athari S.A., 2024. The impact of financial development and technological innovations on renewable energy consumption: Do the roles of economic openness and financial stability matter in BRICS economies?. Geological Journal 59(1): 288-300.

Gyimah J., Yao X., Tachega M.A., Hayford I.S., and Opoku-Mensah E., 2022. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: New evidence from Ghana. Energy 248: 123559.

Fazal S.A., Hayat N., and Al Mamun A., 2023. Renewable energy and sustainable development—Investigating intention and consumption among low-income households in an emerging economy. Sustainability 15(21): 15387.

Ateş H., 2020. Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption 24: 169-180.

Kaiser F.G., Wölfing S., and Fuhrer U., 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of environmental psychology 19(1): 1-19.

Schultz P.W. and L.C. Zelezny. 1998. Values and pro environmental behavior: A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29(4): 540-558.

Harland P., Staats H., and Wilke H.A., 1999. Explaining pro environmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(12): 2505-2528.

Duong K.T., Nguyen T.T., and Do T.A., 2022. The relationship between the factors influencing energy-saving behaviors in households in Urban Vietnam. International Energy Journal 22(3): 291-302.

Defloor B. and B. Bleys. 2017. Understanding pro-environmental behavior using the theory of planned behavior. In 12th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics.

Verma V.K. and B. Chandra. 2018. An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers' green hotel visit intention. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 1152-1162.

Correia E., Sousa S., Viseu C., and Leite J., 2022. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the students’ pro-environmental behavior: a case-study in a Portuguese HEI. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 23(5): 1070-1089.

Londono J.C., Davies K., and Elms J., 2017. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention: The case of an embarrassing product. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 36: 8-20.

Botetzagias I., Dima A.F., and Malesios C., 2015. Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 95: 58-67.

Gao L., Wang S., Li J., and Li H., 2017. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 107-113.

Ru X., Wang S., and Yan S., 2018. Exploring the effects of normative factors and perceived behavioral control on individual’s energy-saving intention: An empirical study in eastern China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 134: 91-99.

Engelken M., Römer B., Drescher M., and Welpe I., 2018. Why homeowners strive for energy self-supply and how policy makers can influence them. Energy Policy 117: 423-433.

Parker D., Manstead A.S., and Stradling S.G., 1995. Extending the theory of planned behavior: The role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology 34(2): 127-138.

Kim Y.G., Woo E., and Nam J., 2018. Sharing economy perspective on an integrative framework of the NAM and TPB. International Journal of Hospitality Management 72: 109-117.

Gill-Wiehl A., Brown T., and Smith K., 2022. The need to prioritize consumption: a difference-in-differences approach to analyze the total effect of India's below-the-poverty-line policies on LPG use. Energy Policy 164: 112915.

Zhang K., Zhu P.H., and Qian X.Y., 2024. National information consumption demonstration city construction and urban green development: A quasi-experiment from Chinese cities. Energy Economics 130: 107313.

Zhao X.Y., 2015. The impact of livelihood strategy on the farmer's living energy consumption pattern: a case of Gannan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica 35(5): 1610-1619.

Zheng X.D., 2017. Research on consumers' participation willingness of community supporting agriculture. Economy and Management 31(04): 33-38.

Shi Q.H., Peng X.H. and Zhang Y., 2014. Research on rural energy consumption in China -- a case study of rural households in Shanxi, Guizhou and Zhejiang provinces. Journal of Management World 05: 80-92.

Zheng J., Dang Y., and Assad U., 2024. Household energy consumption, energy efficiency, and household income–Evidence from China. Applied Energy 353: 122074.

Qiu H.G., Yan J.B., Li D.W., and Han W., 2015. Residential energy consumption in rural China: current situation and determinants for future trend——an empirical study based on filed survey data of 4 provinces. China Soft Science 11: 28-38.

Böhringer C., Landis F., and Tovar Reaños M.A., 2016. Cost-effectiveness and incidence of renewable energy promotion in Germany. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Narayan S. and N. Doytch. 2017. An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption. Energy Economics 68: 160-176.

Liu H. and T. Hu. 2024. Energy poverty alleviation and its implications for household energy consumption and health. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26(4): 10063-10083.

Wang Z., Wu M., Li S., and Wang C., 2021. The effect evaluation of China’s energy-consuming right trading policy: Empirical analysis based on PSM-DID. Sustainability 13(21): 11612.